Blog

  • Vowels and Consonants: Definition and Types Explained

    The speech sounds in English are broadly divided into two kinds namely, vowels and consonants.

    Vowel

    A vowel is a speech sound produced by the air from the lungs allowed to pass freely. /i:/ eg: feet.

    Consonant

    A consonant is a speech sound formed when air from the lungs is not allowed to pass freely. In other words, the speech sound is obstructed. The place where the obstruction takes place is called the place of articulation.

    Places of Articulation

    • Bi-labial
      – which is between the two lips /p, b/ eg: pit, bit
    • Labio-dental
      – lip and teeth, between the lower lip and the upper front teeth /f, v/ eg: five, veil
    • Dental
      – which is between the tongue and the upper front teeth / θ as in
      thick, ð as in this/θ, ð/ eg: (th sound)thin, (dh sound)that
    • Alveolar
      – between the tongue and the alveolar ridge /t, d/ eg: tail, dog
    • Palato-alveolar
      – between the alveolar ridge and the hard palate with the movement of the
      tongue from the alveolar ridge towards the hard palate / ʃ as in ship, ʒ as in vision/ eg: / ʃ , ʒ / sharp, treasure
    • Palatal – between the tongue and the palate /i,
      j/ eg: pin, yard
    • Velar – between soft palate and tongue /k, g/ eg: kite, goat
    • Glottal – between the vocal cords – /h/ eg: hill

    Manner of Articulation

    • Plosive
      – In this kind of articulation, the air from the lungs is completely stopped at
      certain point. When it is released suddenly the air comes out with a plosion,
      e.g. /p, b/ eg: pit, bit
    • Affricate
      – The air from the lungs is completely stopped at some point. When the air
      released rather slowly the air comes out with an audible friction. E.g. / ʈʃ as in check, dʒ as in jungle/.
      Both are called stop consonants.
    • Fricative
      – A flexible organ of speech moves very close to a fixed organ of speech
      leaving a very narrow space between them. The air from the lung goes out
      through this narrow space producing an audible friction. e.g. /s, z/
    • Lateral
      – It’s a flexible organ of speech in contact with a fixed organ of speech. On the
      sides of the point of contact, there are gaps through which the lung air passes.
      E.g. /l/ lion
    • Nasal
      – It’s the soft palate that is lowered sufficiently so that the mouth passage is
      completely closed. All the air from the lungs goes out only through the nose
      (nasal passage), e.g. /m, n, ŋ / mind, nose, sing
    • Flap –
      A movable or a flexible organ of speech executes (produces) a single tap
      against a fixed organ of speech. E.g. /ri:d/ read
    • Roll
      – A flexible organ of speech executes a series of taps against a fixed organ of
      speech. E.g. /tri:/ tree

  • The Organs of Speech

    There are a lot of organs which help a person speak with proper pronunciation and clarity. Some organs are helpful in differentiating the sounds through articulation.

    Lungs

    They act as the main source of energy for speech. It has small air pockets called alveoles in which oxygen is stored. When the air in the alveolus is pushed up, the displaced air comes up the windpipe (trachea) and reaches the larynx. The air passes through the larynx and reaches pharynx. By adjusting the various parts in the mouth different speech sounds are produced before the lung air goes out into the atmosphere either through the mouth (oral passage) or the nose (nasal passage).

    Larynx

    It is the protruding part of the throat commonly called Adam’s apple. It is also known as the soundbox of the body.

    Vocal cords

    They are two elastic strips placed across the larynx facing each other. They are fixed at one end (far end) and free at the other. In the case of normal breathing, the vocal cords are drawn apart leaving a gap between them through which the air passes freely from the lungs. This gap between the vocal cords is known as glottis. Sometimes while speaking, the vocal cords are brought into contact with each other gently. In this position, the air from the lungs pushes through these vocal cords setting them in vibration. Speech sounds that are produced with the vocal cords vibrating are known as voiced sounds, e.g. /z/. sometimes, speech sounds are produced with the vocal cords, not in contact with each other and hence not vibrating such speech sounds which are known as voiceless sounds. E.g. /s/

    Glottal Stop /p/

    It happens when the vocal cords are brought into contact with each other rather firmly and thus stopping the air from passing through them.

    Lips

    The two lips are flexible organs of speech. They can combine with each other to produce certain sounds, e.g. /p, b/. sometimes the lower lip can combine with upper front teeth to produce certain sounds, e.g. /f, v/

    The Roof of the Mouth

    It consists of the upper front teeth, alveolar ridge, palate or hard palate and soft palate.

    Teeth

    The upper front teeth are fixed part of speech. The upper front teeth can combine with the lower lip to produce some sounds like /f, v/. they can also combine with the tongue to produce certain sounds like /ð/ as in this, either, θ as in thing, myth.

    Alveolar Ridge

    It is a hard, bulging, bony part found immediately behind the upper front teeth. This can combine with the tongue to produce certain sounds like /l, t, n/

    Palate

    It is also known as a hard palate.it is the hard-concave part of the roof of the mouth. Sometimes it can combine with the tongue to produce certain sounds, e.g. /j/

    Soft Palate

    It is soft, loosely hanging, the fleshy part after the hard palate. This can be in 3 positions.

    • In between the wall of the mouth and back of the tongue. This is the position of the soft palate in the case of normal breathing. This position is also known as a neutral position. It can be raised sufficiently to be in firm contact with the wall of the mouth.  Then the nasal passage is completely blocked, and all the lung air passes out only through the oral passage (mouth).
    • It can also be lowered sufficiently to be in firm contact with the back of the tongue. Thus, the oral passage is completely locked and all the air from the lung passes out only through the nasal passage (nose).
    • Certain sounds are produced with soft palate and the tongue combining with each other. E.g. /k, g/. the tip of the soft palate is called vellum.

    Tongue

    It is the most flexible part; the prime organ of speech. The tongue is divided into 4 parts namely, the tip, the blade, the front, and the back. The tip of the tongue can move in the direction of the back part of the upper front teeth in the production of certain sounds. / ð, θ/

    The Blade

    It can combine with the alveolar ridge to produce certain sounds, /t, s, n/

    The Front

    The front of the tongue can combine with the hard palate to produce certain sounds, /I, i:, j/

    The Back

    The back of the tongue combines with the soft palate to produce certain sounds, /k/.

  • Aristotle’s Poetics (Part III)

    Aristotle’s Poetics (Part III)

    The artistic ornament in a diction implies the rhythm, harmony and song. Rhythm and harmony in verse may be used to develop some parts and song to imply others. They are all designed to enrich the language of the play to make it more effective. There are a few aspects included in a tragedy and omitted in an epic.

    Tragedy
    Form of action
    Needs much greater concentration
    Has all the elements which an epic has
    More effective
    Has music and spectacle
    Reality of presentation
    Unity of action
    The tale is told with the help of living/moving character
    The speeches and action make the tale
    The dramatist is nowhere seen
    Intended to be acted and read

    Epic
    Artistic ornament
    Lengthy
    Certain elements of tragedy are not seen
    More comprehensive and varied
    Lack of music and spectacle
    Reality and unity are missing here
    Has only rhythm, harmony and song
    Narrator of the story is the poet
    The poet is free to speak in his own person or in the likeness of the character. Only to read

    The Structure of the Plot
    A plot is the soul of the tragedy. It rules out plurality of action. The artistic arrangement of incidents is of prime importance in it.

    Unity of Time
    The tragedy should confine itself as far as possible to a single revolution of the sun, i.e., conformity of the time taken by the events of the place. A good tragic plot has to arouse the emotion of pity and fear in the spectator or the reader. Pity, for the undeserved sufferings of the hero and fear of the worst that may happen to him. The change of fortune should not be from bad to good, but reversely from good to bad. The unhappy ending is the only right ending for it is the most tragic in it effect. A happy ending may please us more, but it will not afford the true tragic pleasure aroused by the pity and fear it follows. Therefore, that the events comprising the plots will concern only one man and not more. There are two ways in which the emotions may be aroused – by spectacular and more theatrical effects and by the inner structure of the plot. “For, the plot ought to be so constructive that even without the aid of the eye, he who hears the tale told will thrill with horror and melt to pity at what takes place”.

    Peripeteia
    It is a deed done in blindness defeating its own purpose. Reversal of action or intention.

    Anagnorisis
    It is the recognition or discovery of truth, i.e., discovery of the false moves taking in ignorance., i.e., change from ignorance to knowledge.

    There are 3 elements in a tragic plot which is titled as ‘Reversal Discovery and Calamity’ by Aristotle.

    • Reversal is a change from one to its opposite.
    • Discovery as the word itself indicates a discovery is a change from ignorance to knowledge and it leads either to love or to hatred between persons destined for good or ill fortune. The discovery of this kind with a reversal will carry with it either pity or fear
    • Suffering or calamity of these three, reversal and discovery are essentially related to the plot and action of the play and so is calamity. A calamity is an action of a destructive or painful nature such as death openly represented, excessive suffering, wounding and the like.

    Main Parts of a Tragedy

    • Prologue – the whole part of a tragedy that precedes the parode, or the first entry of the chorus.
    • Episode – it is the whole of that part of a tragedy that comes between complete choral songs.
    • The Exode – it is the whole of that part of a tragedy which is not followed by a song of the chorus.
    • Chorus – is divided into parode (the first entry of the chorus) and stasimon which is a choral song

    Kinds of Tragedy
    Four kinds of a tragedy are – complex, suffering, character and spectacular.

    Tragic Hero
    Aristotle says,“good men should not be shown passing from prosperity to misery, for, this does not inspire fear or pity, it merely disgusts us”.

    “Nor should evil man be shown progressing from misery to prosperity. This is the most untragic of all plots, for, it has none of the requisites of a tragedy; it does not appeal to our humanity or awake in pity or fear in us.”

    “Nor again should an utterly worthless man be seen falling from prosperity to misery. This may not arouse either pity or fear; for, our pity is awakened by undeserved misfortune, and our fear by that of someone just like ourselves – pity for the undeserving sufferer.”

    Ideal tragic hero – “there remains a mean between these two extremes. This is the sort of man who is not conspicuous for virtue and justice, and whose fall into misery is not due to vice and depravity but rather to some error”.

    Hamartia
    According to Aristotle, a tragic hero is one who falls from high state or fame not through vice of depravity but by some great hamartia. It is an error of judgement.
    An ideal tragedy results from – human error, error on the part of friends and relatives, error on the part of hero himself and the calamity due to the false move blindly made by a friend or kinsman or by himself.

    Characters of a Tragedy
    First and foremost is that the character should be good. Secondly, the place of portrayal should be appropriate. Thirdly, the characters should be lifelike. Fourthly, they should be consistent. The unravelling of the plot should arise from the circumstances of the plot. The dues ex machina should be used only for matters outside the play proper, either for things that happened before it and that cannot be known by the human characters, or things that are yet to come and that require to be foretold prophetically – for, we allow to the Gods the power to see all things.
    “Since tragedy is a representation of people who are better than the average, they must be presented well… in portraying men who are hot tempered or phlegmatic or who have other defects of character, must bring out these qualities in them, and at the same time show them as descent people.”

    Different Kinds of Discovery
    The first is the least artistic and is mostly used from sheer lack of invention, this is discovery by means of visible science or tokens. The second class of discoveries are those which are manufactured by the poet and which are inartistic for that reason. A third kind of discovery is due to memory. The fourth kind is the result of reasoning. Of all the forms of discovery, the least is that which is brought about by the incidents themselves, even the startling disclosure results from events that are probable.

    Phallic Songs
    Are sung in honor of Dionysus, the God of fertility. Comedy represents men as worse than they are and ridicule the general vices. They are merely men of ugliness. By calling them worse, which Aristotle means that they are men with, “some defect which is not painful or destructive”. Its main function is to provoke laughter; no personal attacks and no kind of malicious pleasure is involved. It represents what has happened but what may happen.

    Aristotle’s Style of Writing
    He considers two things in the style of writing – clarity and propriety (a suitable way of writing). The objective of writing is to communicate the meaning and must be intelligible. The same mode of writing cannot be used and for this propriety is important. For, intelligibility, current words can be used for the understanding of the people. In order to gain dignity and be stately, unfamiliar words can be used which will surprise the readers as well as gives a kind of novelty to the person. For poetry – compound words can be used, for an epic – rare and unfamiliar words can be used and for drama – metaphorical language that will be close to the everyday use by the people. A perfect poetic style uses words of all kinds in a judicious combination.

    Defects of Aristotle’s Poetics There are certain defects in Aristotle’s Poetics as it is fragmentary in nature. There is no proportionate discussion in it. He places a tragedy above an epic and has ignored the lyrical poetry and descriptive poetry. The effects of comedy and epic have been slightly treated and a larger part of the discussion is devoted to tragedy alone. The style is telegraphic and highly concentrated. There is often the signs of hesitation and uncertainty in the use of terminology. His theories are based exclusively on Greek poetry and drama.

  • Aristotle’s Poetics (Part II)

    Aristotle’s Poetics (Part II)

    Catharsis (meaning purification). Aristotle implicitly suggests that tragedy helps to keep pity and fear in their due proportions by allowing to find the spiritual purgation of these elements. Catharsis directs out pity and fear towards worthier objects. In a tragedy where the sufferings being witnessed are not our own. These emotions find a free and full outlet relieving the soul of their excess. By showering them on persons other than ourselves we are lifted out of ourselves – our petty self, interest; and ultimately, we emerge nobler than before. So, the emotional appeal of poetry is not harmful as Plato believed but health-giving and artistically satisfying.

    Origin of Tragedy

    Poetry is an imitative art which implies two kinds of actions – a noble action (good men) and a mean action (bad men). A noble action is that of good men who are brought out in an epic. It talks of the graver spirits and imitated actions of good men. An epic is full of composed hymns to God and that of famous persons whose deeds have evolved out of tragedy or comedy. Whereas; a mean action of bad men is being satirized showing a mere trivial sort of imitated mean actions which is mainly practiced through comedy. An epic with a tragic note is considered superior which poses a spectacle and a compact design. Thus, Aristotle notes that, “tragedy, then, is a representation of an action that is worth serious attention, complete in itself, of some amplitude; in language enriched by a variety of artistic devices appropriate to the several parts of the play; presented in the form of action not narration; by means of pity and fear bringing about the purgation of such emotions.”

    Characteristics of Tragedy

    • The tragedy which is basically an imitation of action comprises all human activities –
      • Deeds
      • Thoughts and
      • Actions
    • It (tragedy) gives a serious note possessing –
      • Pity and
      • Fear
    • It is complete and self-contained in nature which has a beginning, a middle and an end.
    • A beginning has further action which flows out intelligibly in itself. It has neither consequence nor dependence on any previous action
    • A middle flows inevitably from what has gone before which leads to an inevitable conclusion
    • An end follows from what has gone before and does not lead to further action
    • It is of certain magnitude in size, its language is embellished in verse and songs; verse in a dialogue form and song in chorus. it also involves pity, fear, and purgation.

    Constituent Parts of Tragedy

    • Plot (is the arrangement of incidents)
    • Character (Character and Thought are the objects it imitates or represents)
    • Thought
    • Diction (Diction and Song are the medium it employs to imitate those objects)
    • Song and
    • Spectacle (the manner of imitating them)

    Plot

    A plot should have a magnitude or reasonable length or size which is an essential condition of beauty. It should be of reasonable length so that the mind can comprehend fully in one view. The representation of such an action is a plot of a tragedy. The plot is an ordered arrangement of incidents with complete, as a whole i.e., well-knit. The completeness here means organic unity or a natural sequence of events that cannot be destroyed. If the plot is too short the mind will miss many things in it to comprehend fully. Whereas, if the plot is too long the mind with its limited perspective cannot take in all the events within the time required by the story. “For tragedy is an imitation, not of men, but of an action and of life and life consists in action”. He also says that the plot should be of “a length which could be easily embraced by the memory”. Rather it should have the length enough to unfold its sequence of events – the beginning, the middle and the end both naturally and fully. He answers the question of whether plot makes a tragedy or a character that “without action, there cannot be a tragedy; there may be without character”. As plot imitates the action, character imitates men, thought imitates men’s mental and emotional reactions to the circumstances in which they find themselves.

    Character

    Character according to him, “determines men’s qualities, but it is by their actions that they are happy or reverse”.

    Thought

    Followed by character is thought or what a character thinks or feels during his career in the play. Thought also reveals itself in speech.

    Diction

    To accomplish the above, Aristotle employs the medium of diction or words “embellished with each kind of artistic ornament”, of which song is one. It is by their means that he expresses the thoughts of his characters and the meaning of the play.

    Spectacle and Stage Representation

    Spectacle depends on the work of a stage mechanic. It constitutes the way the tragedy is presented to the public.

    The artistic ornament here implies the rhythm, harmony, and song. Rhythm and harmony in verse may be used to develop some parts and song to imply others. They are all designed to enrich the language of the play to make it more effective.

  • An Overview of Wolfgang Iser’s The Reading Process

    An Overview of Wolfgang Iser’s The Reading Process

    Wolfgang Iser’s The Reading Process: A Phenomenological Approach

    Reading is a process that envisages an act of comprehension. Whenever we read meaning in a text, we read meaning into a text and out of the text. Therefore, while reading meaning we have to consider two things – the actual text & the actions involved in responding to the text. This is what Roman Ingarden terms as ‘Konkretisation’ meaning realization. The act of konkretisation is bipolar; the aesthetic and the artistic. The aesthetic side of the spectrum is the realization accomplished by the reader. The artistic side of the spectrum holds(entombs) the text created by the author. A work of art is greater or lesser depending on its ability to bring together(convergence’) the text and its reader, and if it comes to life only when read and realized respectively. That is, a work is always greater than the text because in the words of the new critics a text simply is (divorced from its creator and comes alive only when read). On the contrary a work is greater because it is the meeting point of both the text and the reader. This convergent reading is always virtual (this apparentness gives all meanings to a text). But the process of reading unravels the inherent dynamic character of the text and it is because of this virtuality that the text becomes dynamic.

    According to Lawrence Sterne as quoted by Wolfgang Iser, “a literary text is an arena where reader and author participate in the game of imagination, i.e. when everything is ‘told’ the reader has no role to play in the act of reading. Therefore, a literary text should ‘engage’ the reader into imaginative participation. Reading becomes a pleasure only when it is active and creative.”

    It is vey important to note that in this process of creating meaning, the text may engage too much (creating over strain on the reader) or disengage (bring about misrepresentation). Therefore, care should be taken not to distort the meaning of a text on subjective discrimination. Iser goes on to say that the right balance of convergence and konkretisation take place when the reader focuses on the “unwritten part of the text”. Iser calls them blanks or gaps in the text. These blanks or gaps can be typographical, syntactical, semantical or semiotic. Iser believes that the unwritten stimulates the reader imagination. The unwritten makes the reader become the author (implied author). By creating the fillers, now this process of reader imagination is liable to go out of control either due to too much of engaging or ill-informed disengagement. Hence the text ‘imposes’ certain limits to reader fancifulness. Such imposition will prevent either over signification (hyperbolic) or under signification (retort) the nature and the role of gaps and blanks allows even the trivial, the unnoticed, the less noticed and the deliberately ignored and make it serious and enduring how this is formed is seldom noticed or explained, but this is the ultimate interaction between the reader of the text.

    This apparently describable and inexplicable engagement between reader and the text in the act of realization can be explained by a phenomenological analysis. This reading as a dynamic virtuality is mainly psychoanalytical. Hence such an abstract concept needs or requires a phenomenological analysis.

    Reading is an act of pleasure only when it is active and creative. Phenomenology is a way of examining the act of reading in relation to he way in which sentences act upon one another, how consciousness between two entities elate with each other in ringing about meaning. The basic premise for such an analysis is to examine the way ‘sequent sentences’ act upon one another.

    According to Roman Ingarden, the world presented by literary texts is connected and constructed through what he calls ‘intentionale satz korrelate’ which means intentional sentence correlatives. These ‘intentionale satz korrelate’ fornm subtle connections. That is, sentences either link themselves or linked by the reader to form complex units of meaning, giving rise to different genres of varied structures. It is important not that these sentences are only componential parts and do not make the sum total of the text itself.

    Conceiving the connection between correlatives:

    • Connections are points or places or hints or gaps in a text which allow the reader to “climb aboard” the text, i.e., “go into the text or explore”
    • Climbing aboard or entering to explore involves participation of the reader and acceptance by the text. This participation and acceptance are based on a plan or “pre-intention” (in Husserl’s terms)
    • According to Husserl, the expectation formed in the act of realization / reading is called pre-intention. In the act of reading “expectations are continually modified by the intentional correlatives”. Expectations are scarcely fulfilled in literary texts – if expectations are fulfilled, it offers no room for imagination and therefore result in a defective text – intentional correlatives are rigid and unyielding in didactic text. The more the text is “clear” (without raising expectations) the more it is distanced from the reader. They arouse interest in what is to come. When they are modified in succeeding sentences it makes one rethink on what has already been read and reconstruct that which is to be said.

    Memory plays a vital role in reading even as perception does. But memory (recollection) and perception (observation) are not identical. For a reader, new situations and new backgrounds bring to light new aspects of what he had committed to memory. This retrospectively arouses more complex anticipations.

    A literary text triggers our expectations to recreate the world it represents. This is called the “virtual dimension of the text”. Now, the virtual dimension is neither the text itself nor the imagination of its reader but “the coming together” (meeting point) of text and imagination (reader’s imagination).

    The twentieth century School of German Philosophy called Gestalt believes that the perception of the total of anything whole is different from the perception of the sum of its parts. This Gestalt theory is otherwise called anti-atomistic theory. This Gestalt psychology of the virtual dimension therefore believes that a text has the potential for “seven different realizations” – it is inexhaustible. Each reader, in each reading, fills in the gaps in his own way even while he is engaged in the act of reading. This is because “the potential text” is infinitely richer than any of its individual realizations. Therefore, the second, third and multiple readings produce different impressions each time, proportional to the change in the reader’s own circumstances or situations. It is not that the second reading is truer than the first but just that each is “quite simply, different”. Therefore, the reader’s experience of a text reflects his own disposition. The process of reading also involves “anticipation and retrospection; a second reading elicits an advanced retrospection”.

    The stars in the sky, like the literary text, are fixed in their positions. The lines that we draw to create patterns and images out of it depend on our imagination and the situation we are in at that time of drawing connecting lines between each star. Similarly, in a literary text we can only picture things that are not there by drawing connecting lines to fill in the gaps and arrive at that meaning at that time.

    The written part of the text provides us knowledge. But the unwritten part of the text provides us the opportunity to picture things according to our imagination and frame of mind. The picturing of text through our imagination provides us with the Gestalt of a literary text. Even as we are involved in the process of anticipation and expectation and encounter the changes inevitable in both the reader we continue to strive, even unconsciously to fit in everything together in a consistent pattern. The Gestalt is colored and conditioned by the reader’s own characteristic selection process.

  • Periphery to the Center: A Reading on Amitav Ghosh

    Periphery to the Center: A Reading on Amitav Ghosh

    Nation has been considered as an ‘imagined political community’ by Benedict Anderson. It is considered ‘imagined’ as it is limited and assumed as a community to which the people ‘regardless of the actual inequality and exploitation’ are forced to believe nation to be a deep, horizontal comradeship to kill themselves willingly for these imagined and limited notions’. They have been denied the fact that such national myths and communities reject heterogeneity of a nation which lead to suppression and discrimination of various cultures and its diversities. This notion is thrust upon the people by the colonizers through their concept of nation which results in domination within the modern society.

    The concept of nation thus prevents a writer from dealing with the individuals and their psychological perspectives which is an imagined and a limited notion restricting the writer to locate the individual identity and their family bounds beyond a nationalistic view. That is what Amitav Ghosh clearly calls as ‘restrictively imagined collectives’ which creates hindrances in writing about the individual identity. This has been the reason for several writers to displace themselves from dealing with the nationalistic concepts and to locate themselves in analyzing the familial bounds of the individuals.

    This clearly showcases the concept of deconstruction by focusing on familial grounds rather than on nationhood. While Thomas Carlyle defines history as a biography of great men, Ghosh in his The Glass Palace, the Ibis trilogy, The Calcutta Chromosome, The Shadow Lines and The Hungry Tide emphasizes the lives of the individuals in a nation. Though The Glass Palace is well known for its nationalistic views, it also focuses mainly on the space of individuality that these characters long for.

    He seems to believe that such a perception alone can make history truly valid, by giving them space to share their stories and suppression, to these neglected lots. This novel deals with three families and their ties in different settings like India, Burma, and Malay, which is more family bound rather than historical. These characters find a space for themselves that naturally moves them away from the confinement of nation.

    Attaining this space is possible for them only if the individuals are prominent to play a role. For instance, the novel starts with the fall of Burmese dynasty King and Queen by the British in 1830’s. Though this event possesses such remarkable and essential great people of designation, the author prefers the common people to be given the chance to lead the story. The importance that must be given for the great people goes to normal people who either shine or attain failure in their lives.

    In this way, Sea of Poppies has numerous characters as lascars, second mate in ship, indentured laborers and the colonizers. Colonizers meant here are not only the British but also the Indian people of higher social status through their caste and community. The characters of lead role who are offended by these colonizers are given a chance to turn against them as rebellions. A few characters manage to escape from the ship, on a boat, while they are on the way to Mauritius. Unmindful of their nationality and identity, they escape from the hands of their colonizers. The displacement of nation is seen in many of the Ghosh’s novels which act as a mode of deconstruction that throws light on the subjugated who take the role of living in the center.

    In The Calcutta Chromosome, the invention of Malaria by Roland Ross is reinvented as an original idea of an Indian woman Mangala with the help of her assistant Laakhan. She acts behind the scenes and invents the Calcutta Chromosome and indirectly leads Roland Ross through that way as she knew that she would never be recognized for her invention. This scientific thriller proves to be of great ambassador for the concept of deconstructing the subjugated to the center.

    Such a worthy treatment given to these unnoticed ordinary people, the common people who form a wide nation, be it any nation for that matter, grows powerful in all possible ways, yet, somehow, history rejects them to give or provide them a share in the records about the private history. They have space only for the public history that covers these people as a whole lot stating many people died or many sacrifices in general for namesake at times.

    This aspect of such people witnesses nothing better, but recently have been noticed by many creative writers who strain themselves in giving them their share in history through their writings, especially by writing about their private lives and not being nationalistic. Characters in each novel creates a family tie unmindful of their caste or religion or even nationality as seen in The Glass Palace, Sea of Poppies and even The Shadow lines. This family tie binds them together who are capable of looking at themselves as individuals rather than representing their nations.

    The characters in the novel are not representatives of a nation, but as individuals thus forming heterogeneity. Their identities are seen not with their nationalistic approach but as individuals who are in search of their own identities, locating themselves in a space where they feel contented by displaying themselves away from the nationalistic myths and its notions.

    As put forth by several writers, the concept of nation has been separated from that of family ties. Amitav Ghosh is one such writer who finds himself comfortable in displacing his novels from the conceptions of nation. This notion of Ghosh gets reflected in the novels wherein characters distance away from the limited and the imagined communities that restrict their attempts to move further in search of their space in this world. As Bill Ashcroft says, “the issue is not whether we have nations but what kinds of nations”.

    Thus, the author finds multicultural and multi ethnic aspects through his characters in these novels. They find themselves beyond their nation and focus on their cultural identities that gradually leads to their inner selves. This brings in the heterogeneous concepts of a nation rather than homogeneity that dislocate people from identifying themselves. Through these imaginary characters, Ghosh has displaced the notion of nation and has given prominence to the family ties that revolve around their own inner conflicts which have a different imaginary concreteness from that of other countries like Europe and America.

    Sources

    Novels of Amitav Ghosh

    A Correspondence on Provincializing Europe – Amitav Ghosh and Dipesh Chakrabarthy

    Benedict Anderson – Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism

  • Aristotle’s Poetics (Part 1)

    Aristotle’s Poetics (Part 1)

    Aristotle (384-322 BC) was born in Stagira, an ancient Greek city in the central Macedonia. He studied Biology and worked as a teacher. He was the disciple of Plato and joined his academy and remained there for several years. He left the academy shortly after the death of Plato. In 342 BC, he became the mentor of Alexander The Great on the request of Philip II of Macedon. He was the founder of Lyceum, an institution of members who were interested in making philosophical and scientific inquiries. It was a gymnasium sacred to “Apollo Lyceus, the wolf-god”. The institution holds pride in having the famous philosophers as its teachers – Plato, Socrates and Aristotle himself. Aristotle also founded the Peripatetic School; a school of Philosophy. The term ‘Peripatetic’ is used to refer to his followers which is the transliteration of the same in Greek. The term which means ‘to walk’ came into use as Aristotle had a habit of walking while lecturing. The school had its own rise and fall and totally faded away in the third century. He has two major works to his credit, The Poetics and The Rhetoric.

    Aristotle is called the first scientific critic and also the first theologist of literature. His work The Poetics is called the storehouse of literary theory. It is the book whose influence has been continuous and universal. His appeal is a scientific one of observation and analytics. Poetics does not say much about comedy but touches rather briefly on the epic. The purpose of his writing The Poetics and The Rhetoric was to sort out those principles from established practice that made for a good poet and a good orator. The Poetics appears to be a late work by Aristotle since it presupposes in the reader a knowledge of the other works by him. It runs to 50 pages and is fragmentary in nature; probably because it could be the collection of notes from lectures. Some of his ideas are seen inadequately and at times are almost incoherently developed. Its not a treatise in a final form but rather jottings of lecture notes.

    The work had its first printed Greek version in 1536 followed by the critical edition in 1548. Since then The Poetics is one of the most important critical texts in the study of literature. Aristotle opens the text by outlining the scope of the world dealing with the study of the poetic kinds, i.e. epic poetry, dramatic poetry and lyrical poetry. His conclusion on the nature of the poetry and drama are of general application and are as true today as they were in his own day.

    Overview of The Poetics

    The poetics is divisible into 6 parts.

    • The first five chapters (chap 1-5) deal with the
    • Introductory remarks on poetry and its classification into different kinds, including tragedy and comedy.
    • A discussion on imitation – ‘mimesis’
    • The objects of poetic imitation
    • The types of men and activities that are imitated or represented
    • Manner of imitation
    • Traces the origins and developments of poetry
    • The chapters 6-19 are devoted to tragedy. A definition of tragedy is given and its formative elements are discussed.
    • The next three chapters (chap 20-22) are devoted to a discussion of poetic diction, style, vocabulary, etc.
    • The chapter 23 deals with narrative poetry and tragedy
    • The chapters 24-26 deals with the epic in brief and compared with tragedy   
    • The chapter 25 examines the objectives of critics against poetry

    His Observation on Poetry

    The nature and principle of imitation – All arts including poetry, music, painting, dancing is based on imitation. All the artists imitate – their shapes, colors and use of voice. Imitation is produced by the means of – rhythm, language and music either separately or in combinations. Men in action are imitated or represented as either better as in tragedy or worse as in comedy and satire. Based on this, there are two modes of imitation which are narrative and dramatic as seen in an epic poetry. The origin of poetry is based on the principle of imitation and harmony(rhythm). Poetry i.e. either an epic conveyed through a narrator or dramatic which is conveyed through action. This dramatic poetry categorizes itself as tragedy and comedy. A tragedy imitates men as better persons whereas a comedy imitates men as worse. According to him imitation is the common basis for all fine arts differing from each other through – their medium of imitation, objects of imitation and manner of imitation.

    Aristotle considers the nature of the poetic art and calls the poet as an imitator. He argues that the poet imitates one of the three objects –

    • Things as they are or were; what is present or the past
    • Things as they are said or thought to be; what is commonly believed and
    • Things as they are to be; what is ideal

    He believes in the natural pleasure of imitation which is an inborn instinct in man. He says that a poet or an artist is a grown-up child indulging in imitation for the pleasure it affords. There is another natural instinct helping him to make him a poet, i.e. the instinct for harmony and rhythm manifesting itself in metrical composition. The poet’s imitations or pictures of life are not unreal. On the contrary, they reveal truths of a permanent or a universal kind. Aristotle compares poetics to that of history. He says that “the difference is that one (a historian) writes about what has actually happened, while the other (a poet) deals with what might happen. Hence poetry is more philosophical and deserves more serious attention than history, while poetry concerns itself with universal truths, history considers only particular facts”.

  • History being Reconstructed

    History being Reconstructed

    ‘History’, the English word is derived from the Greek word ‘istoria’ meaning inquiry, exploration, research which defines the origin and development of humankind and also depicts a record of the various and distinct events and movements in its time. As Thomas Carlyle defines history, it is a subject that traces the essence of the past innumerable biographies of great men. Here arises a question if history recognizes only the people worthy of talking about or if it is worthy of reading only about the historical figures – more of Kings, Queens, and great leaders. But E.H.Carr has a different view on history-defining it as ‘history means interpretation’ which states that the past can be read in various ways. Therefore, history in literature reflects the author’s subjective or objective observation of life which naturally makes history more interesting.

    In this way, a writer interprets or perceives history that suits his views and ideas for his purpose of creating a literary piece. He attempts to interpret history from a different viewpoint giving it a different perspective. It approaches history through the reading of the past that also regards the lives of the unnoticed or the lives that are considered unimportant by the historians, as he might be subjective rather than being objective. Hence, history can be no longer considered as the record of historical events and that documents the lives of great people, in the context of literature. Recent modern historiography approaches re-examining these events with nearly emerging ideas and interpretations. This rereading of history covers the disregarded or the usually uncovered and forgotten documents as literary pieces. They pave way for the marginalized subjects to come over by throwing light on their ignored lives and lifelessness.

    This is where Amitav Ghosh comes in as a writer who uses history and the great historical events as his main plot that covers the ignored lives and parts of many ordinary people of that time. He tries to create a connection between these events and the ordinary people by throwing lights on them and their roles in history. His works focus on the overshadowed lives of innocent and ordinary people who become either violent or subjugated due to their unavoidable circumstances, by breaking the traditional historiography.

    He focuses on the reality that lies on both sides of history – the covered and the uncovered. Through his imagination and narration, he gives out the reality in his fictions that are more real than fiction. He stresses on the past of the nation that belongs to everybody, both the rulers and the ruled alike. Therefore, he looks at the Partition of India and Pakistan in The Shadow Lines through the eyes of Tha’mma, who loses her grandson in a riot. She once had a passion for her country’s freedom and wanted to join the freedom struggle desperately. Later on, when she witnesses her grandson Tridib being killed in a riot in Dhaka, she undergoes traumatic conflicts within her and screams out her feelings when she is stressed. Her passion for her country is devastated through the loss of her kith and kin unnecessarily and without a valid reason.

    Akin to it, Kusum, a young woman in The Hungry Tide sacrifices her life for the sake of her people in the Morichjhappi Massacre. She leaves her son, a young boy without protection and goes willingly to give a ray of hope for the lives of her people. Yet, these kinds of sacrifices and sufferings find no place in history, as they are people belonging to ordinary lifestyle or people of unknown areas.

    History and historical events change an individual’s life with the intervention of historical reality and the truth. With characters like these, Ghosh tries to reinvent and recreate history that talks of the mere lives and hardships of the ordinary people, who equally have their parts that are played in the events of history. He further succeeds in reinventing history as a writer and not as a historian who fails.

    Through the process of reexamining, Ghosh is able to look into the true meaning and value of history which has an ideal construct of the personal as well as the public lives. He has focused on the stories of the normal individuals that are affected seriously by the public history which focuses exclusively on the great loss of lives, property, etc. it puts forth a question if any historian has attempted to mention the impact of the Partition of a country in the common men like Tha’mma or the struggles of the refugees like Kusum that is worth a price of national history in their records. Rather, they focus only on the public history that deals with loss and tragedy by easily neglecting the personal or private history of such people who have also played a major role in their nation’s welfare.

    This uninvited space has been comfortably handled by the contemporary writers to mark a note of respect on the sacrifices and the struggles that these people have undergone and also to hit the nail sharp on the historian’s viewpoints and on the history of a nation. Thus, creative authors convince themselves to come in terms with history to write the unwritten parts in history that would create a positive air and also would encourage the people or the readers to give away a cordial bow on those unknown faces and the real citizens who have sacrificed a lot of dear ones and properties for the sake of the country’s freedom, reconstructing the stories that were considered unusual r even unique on their own paths.

    In other novels like the Ibis trilogy, he comes out with the ever-devastated lives of people in the Opium War that went on between India, China, and Britain. This war took away the lives of so many uncountable people on both sides. British’s idea of creating an addiction of opium drug on Chinese for the want of slavery and dictatorship that arose due to their debts for china created rage upon the victims and their government to ban such drugs. Growing this opium-producing poppy plants in India also created addiction on Indians that also ended up with ruining many families and indentured laborers.

    These meek and innocent victims and indentured laborers who either volunteered or were forced are given prominence in this trilogy by recreating and reconstructing a live history once again in the present era. Such narrations and histories that are unnoticed and the stories narrating the past I the present create a burden in the hearts of the readers which paves way for the success of the author in the process of recreating and in the reconstruction of history.

  • Conflicts and Man’s Will against Nature

    Conflicts and Man’s Will against Nature

    People, though wonders at the beauty of nature and its creations, fail to realize that they are also part of the web of life in the earth. Moreover, they adopt an anthropocentric attitude towards nature which, in fact, results in exploitation of it. This kind of attitude towards nature has urged several critics and writers to warn them of nature’s two-sided faces – its power and its rebellious nature. They create many nature-centered texts and bring in the importance of establishing a harmonious relationship with nature through their concepts and critical essays. This becomes evident when Serpil Oppermann in his article “Ecocriticism: Natural world in the Literary Viewfinder” says, “Ecocriticism does enable the critics to examine the textualization of the physical environment in literary discourse itself and to develop an earth-centered approach to literary studies”. In this way, Amitav Ghosh has examined the physical environment in his novel The Hungry Tide. As an anthropologist, he finds it easy to locate the problems undergone by the people living in an immense archipelago of islands, the Sundarbans.

    In the same way, he involves nature in the Ibis trilogy, Sea of Poppies, River of Smoke and Flood of Fire. These novels revolve around the major characters with their vast environment as background. Land and water play a vital role in these novels which have almost become characters that mold the lives of the indentured laborers, Zamindar and lascars. Though these people travel in the sea, their lives are almost drenched with cold blood and sweat. Sea of poppies, the name itself suggests that the people are scattered in a way, like the poppy seeds that are down in the land for a harvest that benefits the colonizers. River of smoke, as the title suggests, the characters are interwoven and clouded with compassion, buried emotions, greed and betrayal that form a smoke in their minds and lives.

    Their psychological conflicts and their sufferings leave way to certain circumstances that would lead them to serious troubles, turning their lives upside down. The plots taken by the author hand a strong background that depicts human flaws psychologically, biologically, emotionally and rationally. Piyali Roy, a stubborn American cetologist in The Hungry Tide, holds an attraction for Fokir, a local fisherman in Sunderbans. Being a Bengali herself and not knowing the language, she hired a translator unofficially, named Kanai. The triangle attraction towards each other between Piyali, Fokir and Kanai, forms the plot of the story with nature and its rebellious attitude forming its heavy background.

    Through the character Hardayal Singh, an army man in The Glass Palace. Ghosh reflects Hardayal’s conflicts on being loyal; towards his British officials and for his own country. He considers himself a worthless, alienated man and is awakened by his consciousness to be loyal to his motherland. His conflicts pave him a way for him to join and fight for the freedom struggle in India. It is vividly evident that the characters of each novel have mental traumas and conflicts within themselves, who in one way or other is anxious to be at service to their colonizers or to get rid of their imperial motives. It brings them happiness, and a sense of responsibility to be at service to the British or to accept their sense of anxiety in being colonized.

    Characters like Ila in The Shadow Lines have the impact of the colonizers in her mind that affects her emotions and the binding that she has for her family. She voluntarily falls in love with an English family friend and happens to marry him only to far mental torments and struggles to have neglected her indigenous qualities. Though her outlook and behavior towards her married life look modern and English, she regrets deep within herself for choosing the wrong option, thus depicting hybridity in her identity. Rajkumar of The Glass Palace being an orphan, lands up in Burma due to circumstances and gradually manages to become a “big man” and grows a great Rajkumar Empire there in Burma. In his later part, he is being pushed out of the land where he grew powerful and stands startled. When he is chucked out of his foster land which gave him everything, he is laddered on by his Burmese wife, Dolly. Along with her, he reaches his own motherland India. His mental agony makes him suffer yell a lot of pain and gradually overcomes it with the care that his own land gives him.

    In the same way, Dolly, his wife being a Burmese comes to India when she was ten years old, as the Burmese Royal family was ousted out by the colonizers. She grows up as a woman in India and struggles hard to go back to her motherland Burma through her marriage with Rajkumar. She only has traces of Burma that threatens her like she is running for her life and identity. Her inner conflicts are poured out when she feels and imagines the Princess’s newborn baby to be her own baby.

    These people are thrown away not by the land but by the people either voluntarily or forcefully. Yet the land or the environment forms to be a destroyer, rebelling against the force that tries to govern it. For instance, the Sunderbans is a man-made mangrove where people were brought down from different places to live a care-free, indiscriminate life. But if some people tried to violate the place or the wildlife reservation area that safeguards the man-eaters and crocodiles, it retaliates. The tide becomes hungry and drowns the whole area with storm and waves. This area where humankind can hardly survive is highly sensitive and extremely beautiful but still hazardous to live. Even if they make a living out there, no damage must be done to that area for their own good. This is the fact that Kanai fails to understand at first hand and realizes in the latter part when he is caught in a heavy storm and survives luckily.

    The above-mentioned incidents and characters represent several sorts of conflicts and inner struggles undergone by people at various circumstances, be it natural or unnatural; man-made or environmental. It is evident that they are interwoven and hence nature may show it’s two-sided face- a creator of a destroyer.

  • The Hungry Tide

    The Hungry Tide

    Man, though wonders at the beauty of nature and its creations, fail to realize that they are also part of the web of life in the earth. Moreover, they adopt an anthropocentric attitude towards nature which, in fact, results in exploitation of it.  This kind of attitude towards nature has urged several critics and writers to warn them of nature’s two-sided faces – its power and its rebellious nature. They create many nature-centred texts and bring in the importance of establishing a harmonious relationship with nature through their concepts and critical essays. This becomes evident when Serpil Oppermann in his article “Ecocriticism: Natural world in the Literary Viewfinder” says, “Ecocriticism does enable the critics to examine the textualisation of the physical environment in literary discourse itself and to develop an earth-centred approach to literary studies” (1). In this way, Amitav Ghosh has examined the physical environment in his novel The Hungry Tide. As an anthropologist, he finds it easy to locate the problems undergone by the people living in an immense archipelago of islands, the Sundarbans.

    The Hungry Tide, a complex novel revolves around the very little known but a beautiful part in the world, the Sundarbans stretching from India which is named after the Sundari tree, as the mangrove is locally called. The land often disappears and reappears due to heavy tides and the land has many survivors who battle against nature and its calamities.  “There are no borders here to divide fresh water from salt, the river from the sea. The tides reach as far as three hundred kilometres inland and every day thousands of acres of forest disappear underwater only to re-emerge hours later.”(HT 7). They attempt to live amongst the man-eaters, crocodiles and mangroves that often submerge in the tide.

     Piyali Roy, Kanai, Fokir, Nirmal, Nilima and Moyna have their own associations with nature as either an insider or an outsider respectively. The central character of the novel Piyali Roy, an Indian but a stubborn American cetologist comes to Sundarbans to study the rarely seen Irrawaddy dolphins. It is believed by the people that her arrival on the land disturbs the atmosphere of the tide stricken land. Being a Bengali she does not know her own mother tongue, yet attempts to visit the place for the sake of her research as she basically adores nature for what it is. “She stopped the man with a raised hand and said, in apology, that she knew no Bengali: ami Bangla jani na.” (HT 4). She does not stop for not knowing the language and seeks the help of a translator, Kanai Dutt for her research.

    Kanai Dutt, a linguist who runs a translation bureau accepts to be an informal translator for Piya in her research, especially between Piya and Fokir. He comes to Lusibari on the invitation of his aunt Nilima to unveil the dairy that has been written by his late uncle Nirmal regarding the Morichjapi massacre. They accidentally meet in a local train to Lusibari and Kanai comes forward to help Piya in her research where she hires a local fisherman for the same.

    Fokir the local fisherman, who Piya hires for her research, is the son of Kusum, a woman who had died in the Morichjapi massacre. He lives the way his mother has taught him; to worship the nature goddess “Bon Bibi (HT 103)” and often sings in praise of her. He is looked after by his relative Horen soon after his mother’s death and finds his own way as an illiterate fisherman who blends with the local way of living along with waters and the wild aspects of nature.

    Hence he becomes an insider while he is favourable to Piya and Kanai who are outsiders, in reading the climatic changes of that tide filled the land. Though Kanai is not new to that place, he does not seem to realize the changing attitude of that land and so naturally behaves as an outsider, being unaware of its wildlife aspects. He believes that his knowledge of languages and the outer world are worth noticing and ignores to go deep into the place where he was once brought up.

    Piya relies completely on Fokir, whom she admires and finds him as more comfortable beyond their language obstacles. She often queries him about the Irrawaddy dolphin that she has come in search of, and proposes to go deep into the water to get the readings of the areas where these dolphins are located. This proposal is readily accepted by Moyna, Fokir’s wife, through the help of the translator Kanai and they start their voyage.

    Though she is a cetologist, Piya fails to understand the land in which she continues her research. Her understanding of nature is minimal and she fails to acquire knowledge about the Sundarbans, which is a tide-surrounded land. She has been researching various types of dolphins and has been working with nature related sources, yet her understanding and knowledge about nature seem to be more professional than natural. This mist covers her throughout the novel which always makes her seek support at the time of her unfortunate happenings.

    Unlike Piya and Kanai, Fokir almost has a blend with the current of water and seems more comfortable to be in the water rather than inland. This attitude gains him more knowledge about that particular land and sounds more understandable at times of heavy tides and at times of difficulties in explaining her ideas regarding routes to find more dolphins. It is Fokir who saves Piya from drowning in the beginning of the novel, “At last, when her hands were on the gunwale, he corkscrewed his body under her, pushing her out of the water and into the boat… he weighed her down with his body and fastened his mouth on hers,” (HT 56). In the same way, it is again Fokir who helps Piya at the time of heavy storm by sacrificing his own life. “‘He didn’t make it…’… he’d been hit by something very big and very heavy, an uprooted stump; … He’d said Moyna’s name and Tutul’s before the breath faded on his lips.”(HT 392).

    The land as such is full of water and is quite constant in changing itself even in a short period. This creates a misconception among the survivors of the land that it often destroys the lives of the people. Moreover, the land has wild animals such as man-eaters and crocodiles to which the people have to risk their lives. It has been assumed that nearly twenty per cent of people lose their lives per year. Hence survival is always a question for them. Furthermore, the government has deprived them of their living in the land named Morichjapi in which Fokir’s mother Kusum dies.

    Nirmal, uncle of Kanai has been a retired headmaster who has always been a revolutionary aspired by Marx. He comes to know that a few refugees have newly settled in the Morichjapi land through Kusum who has also accompanied them. He plans to teach these refugee children some knowledge and wished to help them in all possible ways. He forgets that the mangrove is a crucial place to lead a life and favours them at their miseries. When the government warns them of danger, they try to retaliate and hence many lose their lives. Nirmal himself disappears in this massacre and a few along with Fokir and Horen survive. This is where Nirmal completes his diary which Nilima, his widowed wife want Kanai to read.

     Nirmal has married Nilima and has reached Lusibari in 1950 due to his revolutionary activities and hence plans to settle in Lusibari itself. His wife Nilima founded a union which they named as “Badabon Development Trust” (HT 81). She involves herself completely in social service and unlike her husband is quite practical and does not react against the government fearing to lose its support for her trust. She often advises Nirmal to distance himself from involving in the refugees battle for their settlement in their newfound land, but in vain.

    In the same way, “Sir Daniel Hamilton” (HT 78), the British Lord who owned many estates once visited the land of Sundarbans. He found that place to be an imaginary land where people can live without caste and religion. He brought many cultured people from different places, provided those lands and made them settle there in a course of time. He was of the opinion that people might be united and there might be a land with no cultural bounds. However, the idea was a complete fantasy. He failed to realise that his so called imaginary land was basically a mangrove and a forest. His thoughts had failed him to analyse the troubles and risks that people had to face for their survival.

    The fact of living in a dense forest has been denied by Nirmal who revolutionises all the aspects of the refugees. Both of them do not delve much into the land which has a tendency to change its form as it likes. They take nature to be a part of human life and deny the fact that man is a part of nature. They both alike dream of a problem-free and a culture free society that would pave way for the future generation with positive notions where both the genders would be treated equally and lead a peaceful life. “He dreamed of a place where men and women could be farmers in the evening, poets in the afternoon and carpenters in the evening.’” (HT 53).

     Apart from these ideas, Kusum, the victim of Morichjapi massacre, feels depressed that the importance given to the wildlife by the government is not equally given to the human beings who are willing to live in that land. Though the mangrove has been excluded for the sake of wildlife, people who find it difficult to live in drylands and hence seeking this mangrove are not allowed or permitted by the government to settle. This aspect brings in a question whether the animals are more important than human beings by many readers.

    It creates a great impact on the readers and at the same time, human beings who try to settle on the land that is provided for wildlife also becomes a problematic argument put forth through this paper. It is a pity that people are being humiliated by other people for the sake of animals. Yet occupying the space allocated for nature’s sake brings in all these humiliations into the world of humanity.

    At one point in the novel, Piya could not resist the act of killing a tiger that enters their boundary which is actually its own trespassed boundary. She condemns the killing of the tiger saying, “Everywhere in the world dozens of people are killed everyday – on roads, in cars, in traffic. Why is this any worse?”(HT 301) for which Kanai retaliates: “…it was people like you… who made a push to protect the wildlife here, without regard for the human costs. And I’m complicit because people like me – Indians of my class, curry favour with their Western patrons.” (HT 301).

    Kanai appears to be partly right yet, it was the same people who urged others to settle in the same land. Rather than questioning all such aspects, coming out with a solution may lead to the betterment of the situations and commotions among the readers. Hence the fear of risking their lives after their settlement may lead to further fear and panic. Dhivya Anand of La Trobe University, Australia points out in her article “Words on Water: Nature and Agency in Amitav Ghosh’s The Hungry Tide” published in Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies, about the cause of man-eaters, i.e., the tigers hunting human beings.

    A German biologist Hubert Hendrich has done an unfinished research which proves that the attack sites are being surrounded by salty water, affecting the organs of the tigers that drink them, resulting in irritation. But even before finishing his research, his study had been interrupted by Bangladesh’s war of Independence. Furthermore, the never-ending tides that wash away the odour of its prey resemble the odour of the corpses floating in the water. This odour might have made it a habit for these tigers to have become man-eaters. This may also be the cause of loss of habitat that has to be taken under consideration by human beings for the welfare of these animals. Leading a harmonious life in such a land like that of the tribals without harming nature and its creations and without going beyond their utility may help these wild animals to be safe.

    Moreover, killing them alone will lead to nothingness, since they live in a tide stricken forest that covers the lands with heavy storms and waters all over the areas where people are located. Naturally coping up with the climatic conditions and the wildlife surroundings by preventing them from entering their boundaries with the help of technological equipment that is harmless may bear fruits in surviving peacefully in such a mangrove forest. Thus nature shows its calm and demonic faces to human beings by retaliating against the colonial nature of the natives and the settlers as well. Buell’s books, The Future of Environmental Criticism: Environmental Crisis and Literary Imagination, emphasises that literature brought nature into the study through ecocriticism and nature studies that paved way for a better understanding of the physical environment. This has been portrayed in Ghosh’s The Hungry Tide, where the archipelago of islands, the Sundarbans, has been emphasised for its beauty and exploitation by man and his built surroundings.

    Works Consulted

    Ghosh, Amitav. The Hungry Tide.

    Oppermann, Serpil. “Ecocriticism: Natural World in the Literary Viewfinder.”

    Choudhury, Supriya. A Review on The Hungry Tide.

    Soumya B., and Shailendra Kumar Chourasia. “Borders and Boundaries in The Hungry Tide

    Johnson, Loretta. “Greening the Library: The Fundamentals and Future of Ecocriticism”.